Here is the best way I can explain this situation. It comes from my more than 40 years as a licensed optical health care provider.
In healthcare, particularly in the optical industry, there’s a situation where guidelines exist but don’t explicitly dictate which materials to use. For instance, although the government does set standards for impact resistance in eyeglass lenses, there is no law mandating that polycarbonate lenses be used for children under 18. However, because polycarbonate lenses are known to be the most impact-resistant material available, legal precedents have established that healthcare professionals are expected to prioritize these lenses, especially for minors. If a child is injured in an accident and the glasses didn’t have polycarbonate lenses, the healthcare provider could be held liable for not following the industry’s best practices, even though there is no legal mandate. Essentially, there’s no law saying “you must use polycarbonate,” but if an injury occurs, the courts will often find the provider responsible for not using the safest option available. This unwritten industry standard has become a de facto requirement.
Even when parents insist on not using polycarbonate lenses and are willing to sign a waiver—usually to avoid the additional cost of $10 to $60 per pair—the courts still tend to side with the layperson (when an injury occurs) over the licensed professional (despite a signed waiver). As a result, most professionals will either let the sale walk out the door or choose not to make the glasses at all, as this is not one of those situations where the “consumer is always right.”
Now, let’s apply this to the crib mattress question:
Just like the optical industry, there is no explicit requirement or exact standard in the regulations like 16 CFR 1241 or ASTM F2933 for the specific ILD (Indentation Load Deflection) firmness of crib mattresses. These standards primarily address safety aspects, such as flammability and material composition, rather than setting strict guidelines for how firm the mattress should be. Manufacturers such as Newton, Naturepedic, and Sealy comply with these safety regulations, but they do not explicitly define firmness through a specific ILD in those standards. So, there’s no exact “law” saying that a mattress must have an ILD of 25-30.
However, the ILD range of 25-30 has become a widely accepted and recommended firmness range for infant mattresses because it strikes a balance between being firm enough to prevent suffocation (by ensuring the baby can’t sink too deeply into the mattress) while being comfortable for sleep. This is based on research, expert recommendations, and the collective experience of manufacturers, but it’s not explicitly mandated in the standards.
In the same way that optometrists and other licensed eye healthcare professionals know that polycarbonate lenses are the safest for children, mattress manufacturers have arrived at the 25-30 ILD range through a combination of best practices, safety guidelines, and expert recommendations. While no regulations specifically tell them “25-30 ILD,” they are well aware that staying within this range reduces risks to infant health, just like optometrists are aware of the risks involved in not using polycarbonate lenses for children.
In short, while there are no clear, mandated firmness specifications in the standards, the 25-30 ILD range is considered the safest and most appropriate range for infant mattresses, just like polycarbonate lenses are for children’s eyewear. Manufacturers follow this unwritten standard because it aligns with the safety expectations and legal principles that guide their industries. Without this adherence, they risk being held responsible if something goes wrong.
Hopefully, this helps understand how the industry works, although it does not get you to a specific value for mattress firmness that you are looking for.
Maverick